Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Property Tax’

Our Governments Hire Lobbyists to Raise Our Taxes

August 16th, 2009

 

It Appears That the Various Levels of Our Government May be the Largest Users of Lobbyists in Tennessee 

 

hired gunsThere are government paid professional lobbyists, governmental association lobbyists, governmental staff members, and elected and appointed officials who are all lobbying our State Government to further governmental interests that are often adverse to the interests of taxpayers. 

Governmental lobbyists, governmental association lobbyists, governmental officials, officers, and employees are ubiquitous in the halls of the Legislature.

 

Why are they there?  Of course, it is usually all about the money.

Should the various governments be permitted to spend public funds to hire lobbyists to work against taxpayer interests?

NO! !

There is an obvious conflict with the taxpayers and citizens when these lobbyists are used in governmental efforts such as  1) seeking new forms of taxation  2) seeking to increase or expand existing taxes  3) seeking new or increased fees or charges against citizens  4) seeking to obtain hidden tax increases by deleting taxpayers’ rights in the taxing process and in appeals or protests  5) opposing legislation sponsored by individuals and private groups or associations which would promote fairness to taxpayers.

 

LobbyistsNoThe conflict may even be an unavoidable one when public funds are used to pay lobbyists for any governmental purpose. 

Below is a list of single officials, cities, and counties that hire professional lobbyists.  There are numerous other government agencies and districts such as utility companies and school districts, but we don’t have to list these lobbyists to demonstate the broad use of lobbyists by our governments. 

This information was gathered from the records of the Tennessee Ethics Commission.

 

  GOVERNMENTS PROFESSIONAL LOBBYISTS
     
  City of Bartlett                             J. Nathan Green
                                                     Laura Robinson Green
     
  City of Memphis                              Julian Bolton
                                                       J. A. Bucy
                                                     James Farrar
                                                     Jen Lacey
                                                    John Farris
                                                    Mark Smith
                                                     Gif Thornton
     
  City of Johnson City                       Carl Moore
  City of Kingsport                            Carl Moore
  City of Bristol                                Carl Moore
  City of Sevierville                            Carl Moore
  City of Oak Hill                               James Farrar
  City of Pigeon Forge                        John N. New
  City of Oak Ridge                           William Nolan
     
   Knox County                                 Charles B. Welch, Jr.
     
  Shelby County Gov’t Robert Wendell Moore
    Reina Reddish
     
  Town of Dandridge James Farrar
     
  Cumberland County Jenny Ford
     
  Cocke County Charles B. Welch, Jr.
     
  Cities of Alcoa and Maryville Anna Windrow
     
  Davidson County Assessor of Property Ralph Cooper

 

In addition to these directly hired lobbyists, often governments and government officials will join together in associations in order to be more effective in influencing the Legislature and/or the Administration.  In this way all the interests of governments and/or the actual officials can be represented by lobbyists.  

The largest local government associations that hire professional lobbyists are:

 

  ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL LOBBYISTS
     
  The County Officials Association of TN Marie Murphy
     
  TN County Services Assn. Molly Leach Pratt
    Steve Adams
    Ralph Cooper
     
  TN Municipal League Jane Alvis

 

The County Services  Association is comprised of three other associations;  the Association of County Mayors, the Tennessee County Commissioners Association, and the Tennessee County Highway Officials Association.  

The County Officials Association is composed of County Clerks, State Court Clerks, Registers and Trustees.  

The TN Municipal League is composed of Tennessee cities and towns. 

Some of these same Associations, plus others, also have in-house registered lobbyists. 

 

  ASSOCIATION LOBBYISTS
     
  Association of County Mayors Fred Congdon
     
  TN County Services Association C David Seivers
    Robert Wormsley
     
  TN Municipal League Margaret Maharey
    Kevin Krushenski
    John Holloway
    Chad Jenkins
     
  County Hwy Officials Assoc.                 J. Rodney Carmichael           
     
     
  County Commission Assoc. David Connors

 

There are also other governmental agencies and associations whose officers or directors regularly lobby legislators on behalf of their agencies or associations but have not registered as lobbyists with the Tennessee Ethics Commission.  For example:

 

  ASSOCIATION LOBBYISTS
     
  TN Association of Assessing Officers Will Denami

 

This Assessors Association proudly proclaims on their website how well their Director has shepherded important legislation through the Legislature.

big_government1

Therefore, governments, in one form or another, wield enormous power and influence through the use of lobbyists.

Taxpayers presently do not match the power of these government lobbyists, but collectively they do have the potential to far surpass them.  After all, there are more taxpayers than government officials and taxpayers can collectively afford to counter any efforts by the governments to take and/or waste our funds through direct or hidden agenda tax legislation.

Taxpayer power in government affairs is possible and can be obtained through the efforts of the Tennessee Taxpayers Association.   Join and Support.

       copyright – Tennessee Taxpayers Association – August 16, 2009

Email this post Email this post

Categories: Misc. Taxes Tags:

How to Reduce the Property Taxes on Your Home

May 24th, 2009

Well, it has arrived; more bad financial news. The reappraisal notice from the County Assessor is here informing you of the new appraisal on your home for 2009 taxes. The appraised value is up considerably and you see higher taxes. You’re shocked and maybe even outraged. You disagree with the new value and feel like the value is much less.

The question now is, can you protest the value and assessment of your home by yourself without professional help? Can you reduce your property taxes?

Sure you can. It may be difficult, but taxes saved can be worth it. Reappraisals are made on four (4) year cycles which means that unless you do some new construction to your home during this period, the assessment will probably not increase again for four (4) more years. Therefore, you can multiply the first year’s tax savings times four (4).

Tennessee taxpayers are very fortunate because we have a very liberal protest and appeal process. Numerous steps are afforded us to appeal excessive values and assessments. If the taxpayer has gone through all the available administrative levels of appeals and has not achieved satisfactory results, the taxpayer probably didn’t really have a case for reduction.

If your home is located in Shelby, Davidson, or Knox County, our firm has prepared additional websites which will provide you with detailed information on the property tax system, the Assessors’ offices, how to get to their websites, and information on the equalization boards in those counties. At these sites you will also find information on The State Board of Equalization members and that Board’s appeal system.

As you go through the steps of protesting your assessment, you will find some of this information very helpful, You may get there by the using the following links: www.memphispropertytax.com, www.nashvillepropertytax.com, www.knoxvillepropertytax.com.

 

Step Number 1.     Review Notice and Gather Information

First, read the notice closely. Do not miss any filing dates or fail to follow instructions.

Obtain a copy of the Assessor’s sketch and interior records of your home. Check this information. The Assessor has to maintain such records on all properties and it is impossible to do so for so many properties without making some errors. Therefore, you may discover an error has been made which caused your value to be higher than the proper amount. Point this out to the Assessor and it will be corrected. Sometimes it is as simple as that.

Other times, new measurements must be taken and the property has to be inspected by the Assessor. Just make sure you’re right and the Assessor’s information is wrong before you ask for a correction of any errors. Taxpayers have had their assessments increased because the Assessor found additional property or corrected errors made in the taxpayer’s favor.

Also, check the grade the Assessor has classed your home. By grade, I mean the assessors have established quality levels of construction by using a number system. This is sometimes an almost effortless way for a tax reduction. After explaining to the Assessor why your home should not be graded as high, a change just might be agreeable. If the Assessor doesn’t agree, you can make the grade disagreement part of your arguments in later appeals.

Request the comparable sales the Assessor used to value your home. You are entitled to these comparable sales. Review and use them to your advantage. Some or all of these comparable sales may not be truly comparable to your home and adjustments may be necessary. In addition, gather information on your neighbors’ values and assessments. Check sq. ft. values and find out about interior information such as modernizations, fireplaces, bathrooms, etc.

You will need this information. The assessment and sq. ft. information are available on the Assessor’s website.

 

Step Number 2.      Request a Review by the Assessor

The Assessor will allow you to request an informal review of the appraisal. This may solve the entire problem without taking further action. Do not forget to mention deferred maintenance in your property. You know best what needs to be fixed in your home; i.e. outdated kitchens, bathrooms, cracks in foundation, rotten wood, leaky roof, drainage problems and any others you can list. Document these items with photographs. If possible get estimates to repair them.

Also, the comparable sales that the Assessor has relied upon may all have been modernized and all repairs made before the sales. Find out these facts! They are important to your case. If so, make the Assessor aware of the differences. The comparable sales should be adjusted downward to reflect the obsolescence and the physical condition of your home.

Thank the Assessor for discussing the assessment and inquire when you may receive notice of the review decision. Please note that in some counties, you may file online for a review by the Assessor.

 

Step Number 3.      Appeal to County Board of Equalization

If the Assessor has notified you of the review and the results are not satisfactory, you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization. In most counties in Tennessee, these appeals must be filed before the end of June. However, these dates do differ, so to be safe, watch for advertisements and inquire of the filing deadline. Do not miss the deadline.When you file the appeal, you should answer all questions thoroughly. Also, obtain a date stamped receipted copy of the appeal. Be sure to include enough information in the initial appeal so that the reviewers can get some idea of the problem and your basis for appeal. Find out about any rules of the Board. They have rules which change from year to year, so obtain a copy from the Board.

Your first hearing could possibly be before an appointed Hearing Officer acting alone (Homes with high values are usually heard only by the full Board members). Hearing Officers are local citizens, some with real estate backgrounds, who are appointed by the County Board of Equalization to hear appeals for the Board.

Be at the hearing on time and be prepared to present in a composed manner why you feel the Assessor’s value is excessive. The Assessor may or may not be there. Their presence is not required before Hearing Officers. To be well prepared, you must do some research. You already have the Assessor’s comparable sales and you should obtain some more sales which would help your case. You can purchase these sales, your Realtor may help you, or you can easily search them out on the Assessor’s website. The latest sale and the square feet of each home are contained in the Assessor’s site.

In some neighborhoods there are many foreclosure or bank sales available. Present these sales. These sales may represent the market in your neighborhood. For your sales comparisons, you should prepare a table containing the address, parcel number, age, construction type, square feet, special important features, and the sales price per sq. ft. If the Assessor’s value is less than the sale price per square feet, list a column with this number.

These comparable sales should be dated prior to January 1, 2009, because January 1 is the assessment date. The Assessor may object to introduction or consideration of any sale past this date. If you do locate some later dated sales which you feel are a more realistic representation of the market, try to present them. While generally not to be considered by the Boards, and they will probably tell you this, these sales could have an effect on their decision anyway. Just don’t overdo it or insist that they be considered. Do tell the Hearing Officer you are only doing this because these sales are more indicative of the true market. You could also hire an appraiser to prepare an appraisal of your home. This could be helpful at this level but always consider the costs and you can’t be sure that the appraiser’s report will even come close to your value estimate.

Since you are the taxpayer, it may be difficult to keep from displaying emotion. This is okay, however, do not get too excited or raise your voice or be argumentative. Tell the Hearing Officer why you feel the way you do and answer all questions in a straightforward honest manner. Do not tell the Hearing Officer that your taxes are too high or that you cannot afford to pay the tax increase. Taxes are always too high. Everybody knows this and that fact cannot be used as a basis for reduction in the value of your property. The Hearing Officer cannot consider these issues and it will not help you. So, please do not bring these items up for discussion.

If you have found inequities (your neighbors’ assessments are lower than yours) in your neighborhood, go ahead and present them, but they should be significant differences. The Hearing Officers have been instructed to not consider inequities in assessments. By this I mean, the State does not consider inequities as a basis for appeal of an assessment. For the County to ignore inequities and inconsistencies in assessments, in my opinion, is wrong. However, that’s the way it is for right now.

As I mentioned, if you have some really noticeable inequities you might go ahead and present them. It could influence the Hearing Officer to consider more closely some of your other arguments. Our firm has a proprietary method for introducing comparable assessments as evidence and oftentimes they are considered. However, please don’t make that your whole case and be careful not to get your neighbors’ assessments increased.

Thank the Hearing Officer and make sure he has your correct mailing address for notification. You do not want to miss this notice. Once you receive notice, you may accept the Hearing Officer’s recommendation or you may appeal further to the full County Board of Equalization. The appeal period is usually short (sometimes ten days or less), so don’t procrastinate if you wish to file an appeal. Also keep in mind that if you do receive a favorable recommendation, the Assessor may appeal and force a hearing before the full Board members.

 

Step Number 4.      Appeal to Full County Board Members

In this step you will be appearing before the full Board membership. In Shelby County the Board may have as many as nine (9) members, but presently only has seven (7) members. In Davidson and Knox Counties, each Board has five (5) members.Have your comparable sales ready in a neat legible format for hand out (one for each member and one for the Assessor) and have numerous photographs of your home and the comparables, preferably large photographs.

Be very familiar with the comparables and the differences in your home, Also, be familiar with the Assessor’s comparables and be ready to explain why they should not be considered or adjusted for certain differences. If the Assessor uses additional comparable sales that he or she did not provide to you when you requested them, request the Board to rule in your favor because of this unfair tactic. The Board probably will not grant your request but may be influenced to consider more favorably your other arguments.

After you have presented your arguments and information, the Assessor will do the same. Make notes for questions during the Assessor’s presentation and then you will have another opportunity to explain what’s wrong with the Assessor’s presentation and reinforce your arguments. You might wish to hire an appraiser for this level of appeal if the costs justify the results and the appraisal is favorable. Just keep in mind appraisals are not always accepted by the Board because they are just opinions. It’s the same with the Assessor. Their value is just an opinion and many times they argue against the values contained in professional appraisal reports, and win. Therefore, ask the Assessor well before the hearing that if you had a professional appraisal made would the Assessor accept the appraisal.

Once again, if you are aware of some true inequities in assessments in your neighborhood, go ahead and point these out to the Board. The Board will probably tell you they cannot consider these inequities, but it could persuade them to consider your other arguments. Just don’t overdo it, because, in some cases this could cause some damage. If you point out too many inequities and low assessments and it appears to the Board that all your neighbors are under appraised, the Board may order the Assessor to increase all the neighbors. This will make you very unpopular.

This Board will not allow you very long for your presentation so don’t get distracted or argue with any Board member or the Assessor. Be polite, calm and professional. This Board will also usually let you know at the hearing of their decision. Do not take a negative decision personally because even though you may not think so at the time, they truly try to do a good job and are calling it the way they see it based upon what was presented.

Although the hearing is informally conducted, you must really be prepared for this level because you will be asked numerous questions by different Board members. These Board members have heard all the reasons why assessments should be reduced, so you can’t surprise them and you certainly can’t fool them. They will not be impressed by lack of preparation. It will help if you practice your presentation and anticipate questions. Be realistic as possible and eliminate parts that just complain of high taxes and assessments. Don’t take up much time in your presentation.

 

Step Number 5.      Appeal to the State Board of Equalization

If you are still unhappy with the results so far, you may appeal to the State Board of Equalization. You will have forty-five (45) days from the date of the notice from the County Board of Equalization to file an appeal with the State Board of Equalization. Complete the appeal form as completely as possible. Answer all questions. You may file this appeal online on the State Board’s website. If you mail, do it Certified with Receipt. Just don’t be late. There is a fee for filing a State Board appeal and a hearing charge if one is conducted.

Study the State Board’s rules for contested cases. You can find these at Contested Case Procedures and more published by the Secretary of State at Uniform Rules of Procedures for Hearing Contested Cases Before State Administrative Agencies .

It is uncertain as to how long it will be before you will be notified for a hearing because this depends on the number of appeals filed with the State Board. Just let it take its course and wait. It doesn’t help your interest to push the State Board for a hearing. When you are notified, you will be given a date, time, and place to appear before an Administrative Judge or Hearing Officer who hears appeals for the State Board.

Do not let the title of Administrative Judge or Hearing Officer intimidate you. He or she is simply appointed by the State Board to hear the case. The hearings are held informally. In fact, an informal hearing is a legal requirement enacted by the Legislature at the request of our firm. Relax! You are not in court.

If you have picked up new information by all means present it at the hearing if it is helpful. You will also have an opportunity to settle with the Assessor at the hearing. This happens often if you have a reasonable case. Again, be calm and polite, but determined. Ask the Administrative Judge or Hearing Officer to rule in your favor if the Assessor uses comparable sales that he or she did not provide you when you requested them.

You may present inequities in your neighbors’ assessments, but that will receive very little consideration at this level. Try to impress that the value of your property is less than the Assessor’s estimate and why. If you have had an appraisal prepared, your appraiser should be present at this level to testify. Most costs of an appraisal and testimony outweigh the possible results, so calculate these factors carefully.

The administrative judge will notify you later of the decision. You will have thirty (30) days to appeal his or her decision from the date of the decision. Again, send it Certified Mail and don’t be late.

 

Step Number 6.      Appeal to the Assessment Appeals Commission

If you are still not satisfied with the results, you may file a further appeal to the Assessment Appeals Commission, which also hears appeals for the State Board. This Commission consists of up to (6) members (although three members are all that are needed for a quorum).

While this Commission may appear more formal, it really is not. Again, the statute passed at our request and effort requires the hearings at this level to also be informal. You may introduce new evidence if you wish or you may stick with what you used before and point out what the administrative judge failed to consider or give enough weight. Be sure to have good backup for these arguments.

If you had an appraisal made, your appraiser should be present to testify.

The Commission will usually inform you of their decision after the hearing.

 

Step Number 7.      Appeal to Full State Board Members or Lawsuit

You will have other steps after the Commission hearing, but few taxpayers take them. The first is to request a review by the full State Board of Equalization members. They rarely grant this request.

The other option is to go to Chancery Court. If you truly wish to go to court, hire a qualified appraiser because the court will usually not be persuaded by your own evidence. It is extremely rare that value cases go to court in Tennessee.

As I have mentioned earlier, there are so many administrative levels available to a taxpayer that if a taxpayer has lost at all the hearings along the way, there probably was no real case.

There you have it. While possibly a long and tedious process, it can be rewarding and some people may enjoy the experience. Good luck in your venture and don’t give up. If you need assistance, do not hesitate to obtain professional help.

Reprinted with permission of Caruthers & Associates, Inc. -

Copyright – Caruthers & Associates, Inc. – May 24, 2009

Email this post Email this post

Categories: Property Taxes Tags:

TTA Prevents Judicial Review Procedures Before State Board of Equalization

May 22nd, 2009

 
SB 2111 / HB 2075 -  Change hearings and appeals
 to Judicial Review at State  Board of Equalization

The Executive Secretary of the State Board of Equalization had filed a bill in the Legislature, which if passed, would have changed the entire hearing and appeal process before the State Board. This bill was filed without the knowledge of the State Board but once they were advised of the bill, the State Board took no position.   So, it cannot be said that the Board was in favor of its passage.

At the present time, the hearings are not on the record; meaning, that if a taxpayer wants to appeal further, that taxpayer is not bound by the record made at the previous hearing. This procedure is called de novo and it goes all the way to the first level of the court system, Chancery Court.

A change to recorded hearings would have limited the judges to considering any appeal to only what appears in the record from the previous hearing. No new evidence could be presented.

Judicial review would increase costs of the hearings because court reporters would be necessary and also attorneys to ensure that the record was made adequate for the courts to review. To be without an attorney in an appeal limited to the record would prejudice the taxpayer because the record may be made inadequately.

The do novo procedure was part of the legislation package authorizing taxpayers and assessors to choose non-attorney representatives in State Board hearings. The de novo amendment was offered by Senator Haynes who made the statement of intent on the Senate Floor that de novo would be required in order to prevent prejudice to the taxpayers and allow them to continue to freely choose their own representatives.

In addition, TTA had sponsored and passed legislation requiring the State Board to conduct all hearings on an informal basis. Judicial review would have formalized the appeal process to the detriment of the taxpayers.

The Senate State & Local Government Committee heard the arguments from both sides on May 5th and solidly rejected judicial review. The proponents only received one or two voice votes for their amendment which made the bill. They were offered the opportunity to come back with a better bill, but did not return.

This was a good victory for the taxpayers. Judicial Review would have harmed many taxpayers in their attempts to protest their taxes.

If you wish to view the legislative process on this bill on video, here is a link:

http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=SB2111

Click on video clips then click on SB2111 for May 5th. After the video screen appears, scroll down to SB2111 and click.

Thanks to all for their help in defeating this bill.


Email this post Email this post

Categories: Property Taxes Tags:

TTA Stops Bill in the House Which Would Void Illegal Assessments

May 22nd, 2009

SB 2110 / HB2074 – Deleting the Rights of the Taxpayers and the State Board of Equalization

  

Congratulations on a House victory.  On May 20th, before the House State & Local Government Committee, the sponsor and promoters of the above bill have admitted defeat in the House for this year.  Of course, they may bring it back next year, but that’s another battle.

  

If passed, the bill would have deleted the taxpayer’s right to contest an illegally made assessment that should have been voided.  For example, the case that brought this matter up and caused the bill to even be filed was simply a duplicate assessment. 

 

The Comptroller’s Office, which assesses public carrier properties, had assessed this property and erroneously so had the local assessor.  The assessor made an audit on the taxpayer’s assessments and discovered that the assessments she had made were made illegally. The taxpayer was paying twice.  This was all discovered in “2006″ and was appealed then. 

 

The Assessor deleted the assessments as far back as legally allowed leaving only one more year.  The taxpayer appealed to the Assessment Appeals Commission who agreed and voided the assessment as illegally made.  The technical basis for the Decision was called “collateral attack”.

  

The Executive Secretary to the State Board of Equalization, Kelsie Jones, asked the full State Board to review the case.  Neither of the parties appealed nor did they ask the State Board to review the case.  Then, unknown to the State Board, the Executive Secretary unilaterally filed legislation to void the right to appeal such illegal assessments to the State Board.  His argument before the Committees was that legal issues should go to the courts, not to the State Board.

  

It is very difficult for a taxpayer to get into court in this State. First, taxes must  be paid under protest. After the payment date, there is only a 30-day window to file suit for City taxes and only a 6-month window to file in the courts for county taxes. Therefore, unless the taxpayer sued both the city and the county within 30-days, the taxpayer would be forced to file two separate lawsuits. These are  preposterous impositions upon the taxpayers. 

 

Who pays their taxes under protest?  This taxpayer didn’t even know he or she was being illegally assessed!  That taxpayer would have no place to go if there was not a State Board of Equalization to accept an appeal. 

 

The Attorney General even confirmed the right to file an appeal based upon “collateral attack” of an illegal assessment in Opinion 92-62 and plainly stated the State Board ”should” accept these appeals.  Why?  Because it was the right thing to do and the State Board has responsibility for all assessments in the State. 

  

To do away with the right to go to the State Board of Equalization would deny the purpose for which these administrative agencies were created; that is, to keep the taxpayers from being forced to go to court at all. 

  

There have been many bills passed in previous years that delete taxpayers’ rights to protest assessments and taxes.  We must take a stand and this bill is one of those stands.  

 

The Legislators do not intentionally take away our rights.  They pass these bills because they only hear from one side, the government or government officer’s side.  When they hear from the taxpayers’ side and how these bills adversely affect their rights, they vote differently.  They do not wish to vote against the taxpayers.

  

Thanks to all of you who helped by contacting the Legislators and letting them know that this was a bad bill for the taxpayers of the State.

 

We now hear that the sponsor is planning on bringing the bill back this year on the Senate side to place them in a strategic position for passing the bill in the House next year. 

 

We will be sending out information on this issue very soon.  The bill is before the Senate Finance Ways & Means Committee, Tuesday, June 2nd at 1:30PM. 

 

The sponsor may drop the bill if he receives tremendous opposition from emails and calls.  So let them hear from you.

 

 

 

 


Email this post Email this post

Categories: Property Taxes Tags:

Foreclosure Tax Legislation Pending

May 22nd, 2009

Re:  SB 2196 / HB 2175 – Recognize Foreclosure Effects upon Assessments

Senator Jim Kyle and Speaker Lois DeBerry have sponsored this bill, endorsed by the Tennessee Taxpayers Association, to allow the taxing authorities to recognize foreclosure sales in making appraisals and assessments for property tax purposes.

At the present time, certain rules, practices, statutes, and precedents make it difficult for the assessors and the boards of equalization to recognize foreclosure sales as comparable sales in appraising other properties.

Obviously, when foreclosure sales become numerous, they have an effect upon the values in a neighborhood and this should be recognized.

However, foreclosure sales have never reached an epidemic level before where they even had to be recognized. Since there was a limited number, they were always ignored.

This new law, however, would make it possible for the assessor and the boards of equalization to treat taxpayers fairly in appraising their homes at what they are really worth; not some fictitious price higher than the true market value.  Without this new law, it will be very difficult (perhaps impossible) for taxpayers to receive true justice reflected by a real market values. 

The bill is a general bill with local application to only Shelby County.  Shelby has been particularly hit hard by foreclosures and taxes are much higher in Shelby County.   For example, in 2008, taxes on a home in Memphis were 65% higher than a comparable home in Nashville.  Therefore, any overvaluation in Memphis results in respectively a greater burden to the homeowner.

In addition, we anticipate that appeals will go on until this time next year before  a homeowner may even be heard before the boards.  By that time, it will have been necessary to file another appeal for 2010.

Perhaps, the bill may be expanded next year to include other counties, but, this is an emergency year in Shelby County.  Of course, other counties could amend into the bill if they desire. We are sure that the sponsors would not object. In Shelby County, and perhaps some other counties, the 2009 reappraisal has caused increases in the appraisals and assessments of these affected homes.

The bill has sailed through the Committees because of its good intentions and what it will accomplish for the taxpayers of Shelby County.

Please talk your representative and Senator.  Ask him or her to vote for the bill.  It is coming up for vote in the Senate and House soon.


Email this post Email this post

Categories: Property Taxes Tags:

Division of Property Assessments Passes Bill to Allow Them to Intervene in Local Assessment Appeals

May 9th, 2009
Comments Off

          

        State Can Now Intervene in Local Taxpayer’s Appeal

 

The State Division of Property Assessments, aligned with the Tennessee Association of Assessing Officers, has just passed a bill to allow the State Division to intervene in local assessment appeals. 

This means that if the State becomes interested in a local assessment appeal issue, it has the unconditional right to intervene and become a party in a taxpayer’s appeal with all the rights and powers of the assessor of property. 

What’s wrong with this? 

Well, for one thing the State does not collect or receive any of the property tax.   The tax is strictly local. 

And another, this non-elected State representative can approve or disapprove any settlement the Assessor, an elected official, wishes to make with the taxpayers. 

And still another thing wrong?.  The Division is a State agency opposing a taxpayer in a hearing to be decided by the State (State Board of Equalization).  Both agencies come under the State Comptroller’s Office.  We feel this close relationship to be a bit of a biased situation against the taxpayer. 

And yet another thing wrong, this brings all the power of the State and their powerful resources (combined with those of the Assessor)  to bear against the taxpayer.  Not a fair fight.

The Division already makes all the assessments for 90 out of 95 counties in our State.  This makes them a powerful organization wielding enormous influence over local taxation.  In some areas, they even print the tax bills.

Now in the five (5) largest counties in the State (Shelby, Davidson, Rutherford, Knox, and Hamilton),  in which the Division doesn’t make the appraisals or assessments, the Division can intervene and be a party there as well.  

So watch out taxpayers.  Don’t expect to deal with the person you voted for as Assessor of Property.  

We now have a State Assessor’s Office where no-one is elected by Tennessee citizens.


Email this post Email this post

Categories: Property Taxes Tags:

Tennessee has Another Senior Citizen Tax Freeze

May 9th, 2009

Did You Know?  Tennessee Has Another Senior Citizen Tax Freeze Law!  

 

Yes!!  We do have another tax freeze procedure available to our senior citizens. 

Several years ago the Tennessee Constitution was changed to enable the Legislature to enact  legislation which would allow local governments to adopt a tax freeze for senior citizens over the age of 65.

 

Senator Mark Norris, Republican, Shelby County, did a marvelous job is getting this major legislation passed.  He deserves tremendous credit for this work and this organization will see that the gets a lot of it. 

 

The catch is that the Legislature put on an income limitation to Senator  Norris’ enactment is very prohibitive.  So, not enough deserving senior citizens are going to receive benefit from this freeze. 

 

For example, in Shelby County the annual income limitation is $33,340 per annum, and that includes income from just about all sources.  In Davidson County the annual income limitation is $36,200 and in Knox County the limit is $34,070.

 

That’s sad, because it knocks out so many deserving seniors who have struggled to support our local governments through property taxes all their lives. 

 

What may be even sadder is that as of March of this year, only twenty (20) counties and twenty (20) cites have even approved this tax freeze.

 

Golly Gee!  It’s only a tax freeze.  It’s not going to break the governments and there won’t even be any immediate effect.  The taxes are frozen at the level that existed at the time the taxpayer was approved for the freeze.  The taxpayer receives no immediate tax reduction.  

 

Taxes stay at the same level as assessments and tax rates increase.  Considering that values of homes have fallen in recent times, the tax freeze is of dubious value or benefit.  Many taxpayers will receive reductions in taxes because of the decreases in property values. 

 

Contrasted to other states, which provide its citizens with Homestead Exemptions, the tax freeze in Tennessee is not enough.  It is especially not a enough with the low income limit in place.  

 

In Homestead states, taxpayers get immediate reductions in taxes and value or credits which equates to real immediate tax dollar savings.

 

Tennessee does not offer its citizens a Homestead Exemption.  Mississippi offers a homestead exemption to all citizens regardless of age and regardless of income.

 

In Mississippi, each citizen who applies receives a tax credit of up to $300 in actual taxes off their tax bill.   If the homeowner is over 65, the senior gets an additional exemption up to $75,000 in appraised value. 

 

A Homestead exemption is much better, but the Tennessee Constitution will not allow it.

 

However, Tennessee does have another tax freeze to offer its citizens as an alternative to the one being used by the few counties that implement it. 

 

At the time the alternative tax freeze was enacted, our Constitution did not even allow a regular tax freeze.  The freeze had to be designed along the lines of the freezes offered businesses to locate in a certain city or county. 

 

Under this method, title of the property is actually transferred to the local government, usually for $1.00, and is leased back by the taxpayer at rent equal to the amount of taxes at the time of the freeze.  The taxpayer pays the lease amount each year instead of taxes because the property is exempt (owned by city or county).

 

In that way the taxes are really frozen.  The taxpayer has the right to repurchase the property for usually $1.00 at any time or at the end of the lease. 

 

Sure it’s a gimmick, but it works for the large commercial properties, why wouldn’t it work for the homeowners?

 

It sure would work!

 

A homeowner transfers title to the government for a $1.00 and taxes are frozen until the homeowner dies, sells the property, or just wants to stop the freeze.  In any of those events, title is returned to the homeowner.

 

At any time the homeowner may repurchase the property for $1.00 and the tax freeze is over.

 

Simple?  Yes it is!

 

However, because of the anticipated costs, the cities and counties have ignored this little known law.  They have tried to discourage it by making the procedures appear so ominous as to scare away the taxpayer homeowners.

 

The procedure is not ominous because it is done all the time.  It is a standard way of freezing taxes on commercial and industrial properties and has has worked very well for a long time for those properties. 

 

I would do it on my house in a heartbeat.  No fear.  It works and works well, safely.  If you don’t pay the rent, guess what?  You lose the property. 

 

Well!  Guess what?  If you don’t pay your property taxes you also lose your property.  No difference whatsoever.

 

To qualify, the taxpayer must be at least 70 years old and have paid taxes on a residence in Tennessee for at least 20 years.  This is open to all taxpayers of all income ranges.  

 

Hence the lack of interest by the cities and counties.   We really need to take some action that will give some real benefit to the seniors.   Either raise the income limitations to realistic levels on Senator Norris’ bill, or use this alternative tax freeze method.

 

 

 

 


Email this post Email this post

Categories: Property Taxes Tags:

New Property Tax Legislation Proposed for 2009

April 9th, 2009

This is the first report on proposed legislation which could affect your assessments and property taxes. These are not all the bills filed, but they are the ones we feel which would most impact the taxpayers.Please keep in mind the legislative process is very important to the taxpayers. There are so many bills filed that seek to close opportunities for taxpayers to obtain reductions. It is important to read these bills because some of the changes are very subtle and appear harmless, oftentimes even helpful. These bills have what we call “Hidden Agendas”; that is, they state one purpose, but really have another.

Thank you for your interest in the legislative process.

SB 0873 – HB 0889:The bill provides that any business taxpayer who fails to file a personal property schedule and has received a forced assessment may have an additional remedy to seek relief from the forced assessment. At the present time, the only remedy is to appeal to the county board of equalization and if the filing date for that board is missed by the taxpayer, there are no further remedies. This proposed law would in effect allow the taxpayer until March 1 of the second year following the year of assessment to apply for a correction. However, nothing is free, and the penalty for receiving any relief is 25% of the relief granted. If it is determined the taxpayer was out of business and did not own or lease personal property held for business, the assessor may correct any forced assessment made against such taxpayer. This bill gives more correction rights to a taxpayer who did not file at all for two years than to a taxpayer who filed one day late. It is very unfairly written.(Senate: Ketron; House: Hackworth)

SB 1570 – HB 1535: If passed, this bill will permit the State Division of Property Assessment to intervene in contested cases between taxpayers and the assessors before the State Board of Equalization. The real effect of the bill is to permit the State to represent the county assessors against the taxpayers. The bill also lists others who are authorized to represent the assessors of property in certain types of contested cases. (Senate: Ketron; House: McCormick)

SB 2110 – HB 2074: This bill extends the time allotted to assessors for correcting errors from March 1 to September 1 of the second year following the tax year in question. They may also now correct errors made in calculating personal property returns in addition the existing power to correct acreage size, square feet, and other type clerical errors. The bill does not permit the assessor to correct errors made by the taxpayer in the taxpayer’s personal property return. The taxpayers must correct these errors under the amended schedule law which allows a full year less than the assessor has to correct errors made by the assessor This is another unfair attempt to change the law so that taxpayers have more difficulty in recovering erroneously paid taxes. The bill also eliminates the taxpayers’ right to file with the State Board on assessments which the taxpayers feel that are unconstitutional or should be voided by a collateral attack. (Senate: Overbey; House: Fitzhugh)

SB 2196 – HB 2175: This bill will force the assessor to correct errors made by taxpayers in filing tangible personal property returns. At the present time the assessor does not have to correct any such errors made by the taxpayer under the correction of errors statute. In order to have an error corrected the taxpayer must file an amended personal property schedule which has a much shorter time period for filing than correction by error by the assessor. Bill applies only to Shelby County. Our firm also drafted this bill. (Senate: Kyle; House : DeBerry L.)

SB 0750 – HB 0559: Taxpayers may approve tax rate increases by referendum if the voters have determined by a previous referendum that all tax rate increases must be approved by the voters. Referendum to approve tax rates may be placed on the ballot by petition signed by 10% of registered voters. (S: Johnson J.; H: Kelsey)

SB 0279 – HB 0382: The bill provides that properties qualified as low rental apartments by the IRS code, shall be valued on a basis less than other apartment properties. Provides that the value shall equal the gross rental times a multiplier of 6. (Senate: Haynes J.; House: Sargent)

SB 2111 – HB 2075: This bill would remove the taxpayers’ long standing right to introduce new evidence into the courts. At present, a case may go to court on a de novo basis once the hearing with the State Board of Equalization is over. The new law would delete the de novo provisions of the law and limit the courts to the power to only review the case from the record made at the state board hearing. If passed, this bill will certainly enhance the power of the State Board’s decisions. This is a limitation of what the courts can do with a State Board decision and we feel is harmful to the taxpayers. The bill also appears to ultimately require that only lawyers represent taxpayers before the State Board of Equalization.(Senate: Overbey; House: Fitzhugh)


Email this post Email this post

Categories: Property Taxes Tags: